澳洲堪培拉代写assignment:生命的意义是什么

2018-10-23 18:59

从创世以来，人们一直在问一个普遍的问题:“生命的意义是什么?”今天人们的回答可能与几千年前大不相同。然而，两位重要的哲学家，加缪和纳格尔，都对我们认为赋予生命价值的东西做出了巨大贡献。内格尔的立场是，无论如何，我们总是可以怀疑这个世界有任何内在价值，或者我们做的每件事都很重要。然而，加缪关注的是人对意义/感觉/价值/理性的需求与世界内在缺乏同样的价值之间的冲突。就我个人而言，我支持加缪和他的信念，因为我们每天做的每一个决定都与每个需求有某种关联。加缪和纳格尔的关键区别之一是加缪在西西弗斯的神话中坚持荒谬的产生是因为世界无法满足我们对意义的需求。这表明，如果世界有所不同，它可能会满足这些需求。这个想法不仅取决于人，还取决于世界，类似于“先生，我存在”的想法。一个人离不开另一个人。如果人们不要求意义，或者世界不够有意义，那就不会有任何荒谬。如果你看看纳格尔，你会发现他的荒谬是完全包含在人类之中的，人们总是怀疑世界是有意义的，因此，荒谬是人类存在的基本事实。
澳洲堪培拉代写assignment:生命的意义是什么
Since the beginning of time people have been asking the universal question of “What is the meaning of life?” Answers from people today may vary greatly from that of thousands of years ago. However, two key philosophers, Camus and Nagel, have both contributed greatly to what we believe gives life value. Nagel’s stance is that no matter what, we can always doubt that the world has any intrinsic value, or that everything we do matters. Camus, however, focuses on the idea of the confrontation between man’s demand for meaning/sense/value/rationality and the world’s intrinsic lack of these same values. Personally, I side with Camus and his beliefs due to the fact that each decision we make on a day to day basis is somehow correlated with each demand.One of the key differences between Camus and Nagel is Camus maintains in The Myth of Sisyphus that the absurd arises because the world is unable to meet our demands for meaning. This suggests that the world might satisfy those demands if it were different. This idea depends on not only people but the world, similar to the idea of “Sir I Exist.” One cannot be without the other. If people did not demand meaning, or if the world wasn’t meaningful enough there wouldn’t be any absurd. Then if you look at Nagel, his absurd is entirely contained within people, and the fact that people can always doubt that the world is meaningful, so, therefore, the absurd is an essential fact to that of human existence.

• 上一篇：澳洲堪培拉代写assignment:主观的道德
• 下一篇：澳洲留学生论文代写:避税的定义