澳洲迪肯论文代写:社会政治道德

2018-10-14 21:43

德夫林试图达到的平衡是在当代社会政治道德的背景下实现的，在当代社会中，宽容本身就是一个主要的道德原则。因此，“必须容忍符合[6]社会完整的最大个人自由”。德夫林为道德的法律强制执行辩护是将伤害原则扩展到对社会的一种感知威胁，而不是对其他个人的伤害。这似乎是一个相当合理的建议。然而，这个测试是伪装成(1)一个相关的测试原则和(2)一个客观的测试。德夫林笔下的“通情达理的人”并没有从社会学的角度被问及道德败坏对社会的真正威胁是什么。相反，有人问他，他对什么感到厌恶。此外，他还断言，虽然合理的人测试被用来使法庭问题与某一特定法律问题的当事人的主观意见疏远，但在这种情况下却不一定有同样的效果。德夫林用了“通情达理的人”这个词来给人客观的印象。然而，当涉及到棘手的道德问题时，认为有一个通情达理的人是虚构的。法律小说中的理性人是指在行动中运用实际理性和充分考虑的人。然而，世界上所有的实际理由和适当的考虑都不会改变人们的偏好——一种体现厌恶的偏见。在同性恋问题上，很多人在理智上认为人们的性取向不需要法律干预，但他们还是觉得同性恋行为是令人反感的。因此，“合理的男人测试”是对主流社会美学的一种虚假验证，而不是对社会感到威胁的一种测试.
澳洲迪肯论文代写:社会政治道德
The balance that Devlin seeks to achieve is placed in the context of the political morality of contemporary society, where toleration is itself a prime moral principle. Thus there “Must be toleration of the maximum individual freedom that is consistent with the integrity of society[6]”. Devlin’s justification for the legal enforcement of morality is an extension of the harm principle to a perceived threat to society, rather than harm to other individuals. This seems quite a reasonable proposition. However this test is one that masquerades as (1) a relevant test for the principle and (2) an objective test. Devlin’s reasonable man is not asked in sociological terms what immorality is actually threatening to society. He is asked, instead, what he feels disgust at.Further he asserts that whilst the reasonable man test is employed as a way of alienating a courtroom issue from the subjective opinions of parties to a particular legal issue, it does not necessarily have the same effect in this situation. Devlin employs the term reasonable man to give the impression of objectivity. However it is a fiction to suggest that there is a reasonable man when it comes to difficult moral issues. The reasonable man of legal fiction is one who employs practical reason and due consideration when acting. However, all the practical reason and due consideration in the world will not change the preferences an prejudices that embody disgust. On the issue of homosexuality, many people intellectually feel that people’s sexual orientation is not a matter for legal intervention, but they nonetheless find homosexual acts to be repellent. The reasonable man test is thus a spurious validation for prevailing societal aesthetics, rather than a test of what society feels to be threatening