ASSIGNMENT代写

Nursing Assignment代写 女孩身高

2016-12-17 10:56


然而,较短的女性更容易被形容为可爱、活泼,常有积极的内涵。因此,在这项研究中的女性参与者,谁报告其平均高度为65英寸的BPL组,在对照组和65.09英寸,对于缺乏差异可能帐户,因为女性有可能确定与规范的描述,可以说是没有太大的不同,在高度。

同样,组间的重量分析显示两个条件之间的统计上的显着差异,其中的平均重量在伪管道条件下是比较大的控制条件。这样的结果可能反映,与会者认为它是社会规范,也就是说,重的人通常被认为是不太有吸引力的,尤其是当他们较短。同样有趣的是,组间差异的平均重量是14磅,发现,这是美国人的平均自报体重之间的差异非常相似(176磅),理想体重(161磅),这大约是15磅

(布朗,2013)。这样的结果似乎跟结果的外部有效性和普遍性,尽管实验者主要关注内部效度,确保操作设计体现理论研究(Sundar,1999)。

不同程度的柱头附着高度和重量可以解释每个属性的结果之间的差异。即重或较短的个体可以进行社会污名,以匹配,因为他们可以感知的社会状态,如人的财务能力,发挥重要作用的野心,勤劳,资源获取的线索”(巴斯,1989,p.12),,,等,这些属性可以被视为反对男性和女性的生殖目标(Gangestad巴斯,1993)。较短的人歧视,较重的人可能会导致更不利的社会地位。

Nursing Assignment代写 女孩身高

However, shorter females are more likely to be described as cute or perky, which often have positive connotations.  As such, female participants in this study, who reported their average heights as 65.00 inches in the BPL group, and 65.09 inches in the control group, likely accounts for the lack of difference, because females likely identify with the normative descriptions, which could be said to be not too different, in terms of height.
Again, though, an analysis of weight between the groups shows a statistically significant difference between two conditions, wherein the mean of weight in the bogus pipeline condition is larger in comparison to the control condition.  Such a result may reflect that participants perceived it to be socially normative, that is, heavier people are generally considered less attractive, particularly when they are shorter.  As well interestingly, the difference found in the mean weights between the groups was 14 pounds, which is very similar to the difference between Americans’ average self-reported weight (176 lbs) and their ideal weight (161 lbs), which is approximately 15 pounds
(Brown, 2013).  Such findings would seem to speak to the external validity and generalizability of the results, although experimenters are mainly concerned with internal validity, or making sure that the manipulations devised reflect the theories being examined (Sundar, 1999).  
Different levels of stigma attached to height and weight may explain the discrepancy between findings for each attribute.  That is, heavier or shorter individuals can carry social stigmas that regard matchmaking, because they can be perceived to play an important role in social statuses such as men’s “financial capacity, ambition, industriousness, cues to resource acquisition” (Buss, 1989, p.12), and, as such, those attributes can be seen as opposing reproductive goals of males and females (Gangestad & Buss, 1993). Compared to discrimination against shorter individuals, heavier people may lead to a more disadvantage social position.