昆士兰代写assignment:证据表明

2017-03-05 14:30

大量的证据表明，人格障碍在DSM-IV定义假设的结构，采用具有特定类别的方便，而不是基于实证证据。的确，在一个国际调查的心理学家和精神病学家多数是不满，人格障碍的概念（Maser，kaelber，与魏泽，1991）。也许这些人格障碍的兴起是一种试图将行为与社会规范不符的行为。无论这些标签的兴起的原因，很明显，有一个迫切需要修订这些类别，更准确地反映了谁是向临床医生提出的人。该维度的使用似乎是一个很好的替代解决方案，无论是使用FFM或发展与临床医生的帮助另一个。在这样做时，心理学家已经建立的经验证据被用来分析一系列的疾病，精神病学家历来分析分类时尚。假设结构的类别可能仍然是有用的，作为一个速记的讨论，但应带到一个混合系统的三维特征

昆士兰代写assignment:证据表明

Much of evidence suggests that personality disorders as defined in the DSM-IV are hypothetical constructs, adopted for the convenience of having particular categories, rather than being based on the empirical evidence. Indeed in an international survey of psychologists and psychiatrists the majority were dissatisfied with the concept of personality disorders (Maser, Kaelber, & Weise, 1991). Perhaps the rise of these personality disorders are an attempt to label behaviour that is out of line with societal norms as somehow deviant. Whatever the cause of the rise of these labels, it is clear that there is an urgent need for the revision of these categories, to more accurately reflect the people who are presenting to clinicians. The use of the trait dimensions seems like a good alternative solution - whether it is using the FFM or developing an alternative with the help of practicing clinicians. In doing so the empirical evidence that psychologists have built up is used to analyse a range of disorders which psychiatrists have traditionally analysed in categorical fashion. The hypothetical construct of categories may still be useful as a shorthand for discussion but should be brought together with dimensional traits into a hybrid system