ASSIGNMENT代写

美国assignment代写:设计的说法

2017-03-16 13:19

[美国assignment代写:设计的说法]从设计的说法声称,宇宙是如此复杂,甚至比最复杂的人类创造,它只能由一个设计师创造了一个更高层次的智力比人类。因此,从设计的论点很大程度上依赖于人类制造的对象和自然发生的物体之间的类比,正是这种比喻,已严重批评。休姆(1947:150),例如,认为这完全是错误的比较人类对象的宇宙,因为我们人类对对象创建过程的经验,我们没有对宇宙的形成是因为宇宙是独一无二的体验。[ 3 ],因此我们可以很舒适的认为某些对象通过智能设计创造(如房子),因为我们有自己的创作经验。我们绝对没有经验的宇宙是如何创造,但是,也不是自然发生的物体,如人的眼睛。因此,纯粹的推测,认为宇宙已经通过智能设计创造,因为我们不可能知道这从经验。从设计的论点,休姆因此无效因为其之间的人造物体和宇宙是无法验证的,是完全的类比。

美国assignment代写:设计的说法

The argument from design claims that the universe is so complex, more so than even the most complex of human creations, that it can only have been created by a designer with a higher level of intelligence than humanity. The argument from design therefore relies heavily on an analogy between human made objects and naturally occurring objects, and it is this analogy which has been heavily criticised. Hume (1947:150), for example, argues that it is entirely false to compare human objects with the universe, because while we have experience of the processes of human created objects, we have no experience of how universes are created because the universe is singularly unique.[3] We can therefore quite comfortable argue that certain objects have been created through intelligent design (such as houses), because we have experience of their creation. We have absolutely no experience of how the universe is created however, nor naturally occurring objects such as the human eye. It is therefore pure conjecture to argue that the universe has been created through intelligent design, as we cannot possibly know this from experience. The argument from design is therefore invalid for Hume because its analogy between human made objects and the universe is impossible to verify and remains completely conjectural.