美国作业代写:解释国内法律

2017-04-05 00:25

我们的法院现在有义务解释国内法律，因此可能与英国法律，议会主权和英国议会的目的可能发生冲突[ 11 ]。这导致考虑欧洲宪法的讨论，这一直是一个最新提出的介绍在欧盟和一直很有争议，因为许多国家把它作为进一步整合，在欧洲社会平等的一种方式，而不仅仅是经济，也带走了进一步整合和平衡障碍运动场在欧盟不同的球员，即减少，更强大的国家可以覆盖需求和弱小国家主权的可能性。然而，也有其他国家，如英国，以经济为由抵制这部宪法，以及政治和社会的理由，其中包括主权的丧失。看来，欧盟的未来包括一体化的加强，但这意味着在主权的成本，即使在过去的情况，如法克特塔梅[ 12 ]，英国的法律已经能够逃避这个现实。然而，随着欧洲宪法，它看起来较小主权国家将不可避免。正是这个主权问题导致了英国的阻力，作为一个议会至高无上的国家，不受任何其他权力或宪法的约束，使得一体化变得更加困难。因此，尽管欧盟法律是平等和多元的政治和法律的社会是最重要的成员国的传统社会价值观，这样如果将传统的权利理论创造的不民主的制度，但一个笨拙的庞然大物，对具体的法律和侵蚀的基本规则–一主权国家在统一收集。
美国作业代写:解释国内法律
Our courts are now obliged to interpret domestic laws in the light of the purpose or aim of any relevant EU law[10]; therefore causing possible conflicts with UK law, parliamentary sovereignty and the purpose of the UK Parliament[11]. This leads to discussion to consider the European Constitution, which has been one of the latest proposed introductions in the European Union and has been very controversial, as many states see it as a way for further integration and equality in the European societies, rather than just the economy, as well taking away a further barrier to integration and equalizing the playing field amongst the different players of EU, i.e. reducing the possibility that more powerful nations can override the needs and sovereignty of weaker nations. However there are other countries such as the UK which resist this constitution on economic grounds, as well as political and social grounds, which include the loss of sovereignty. It looks that the future of the EU includes the strengthening of integration, but this means at the cost of sovereignty, even though in past cases, such as Factortame[12], English law has been able to dodge this reality. However with the European Constitution, it looks like a lesser sovereignty of state will be inevitable. It is this question of sovereignty that has lead to resistance in the UK, as a country where Parliament is supreme and not subject to any other power or constitution, makes it a lot harder for integration. Therefore although EU law purports equality and a plural political and legal society it is overriding the traditional societal values of member states and in doing this if one applies traditional rights theory creates not a democratic system but a clumsy leviathan that imposes specific laws and erodes its basic precept – a collection of sovereign nations in unity.

• 上一篇：美国代写assignment:社会主义政党
• 下一篇：美国代写assignment:教育工作者