澳洲论文代写:法律途径

2017-04-06 00:33

从法律途径，英国的工会开始失去动力，通过立法在上世纪80年代引入。“关店”安排是违法的，和罢工权是由一系列的法律，包括禁止非官方的行动，允许公司苏工业行动有限公司。这些法律的同时，提高工会的成本，组织和降低成本的雇主在挑战工会。（梅特卡夫2003）如果工人不能集体谈判他们的劳动，他们在谈判中施加压力的能力是有限的-没有太多其他的谈判桌。因此，工会必须保持合法的合法性，以保持相关性。没有法律的支持，工会很容易被“影响”为非工会同行。另一种方式结合相关性下降从法律的角度是通过法律承认表示交替形式。传统上，英国雇员的代表权只限于“认可的工会”，其他形式的代表没有提及。根据1994欧洲法院的判决，在英国的1995条法律中，非工会雇员代表为“没有认可工会的信息和协商的目的”作出了规定。（特里，1999）英国有可能遵循欧洲的脚步，给予进一步的法律权力和承认非工会代表。非工会代表结构的增加的权力降低工会的相关性，因为他们变得不显着（从法律的方法）比任何其他代表组。这种情况可以通过两种方式来接近。
澳洲论文代写:法律途径
From a legal approach, unions in Britain initially lost power through legislation introduced through the 1980s. ‘Closed shop’ arrangements were outlawed, and the right to strike was limited by a series of laws which included outlawing unofficial action and allowing companies to sue for industrial action. These laws had the simultaneous effect of raising the cost for unions to organise and decreasing the cost for employers when challenging unions. (Metcalf 2003) If workers cannot collectively bargain with their labour, their ability to apply pressure during negotiations is limited – there is not much else they come to the bargaining table with. Thus it is imperative for unions to maintain legal legitimacy in order to maintain relevance. Without legal support, unions are prone to being as “uninfluential” as their non-union counterparts.Another way union relevance is declining from a legal perspective is through laws which acknowledge alternate forms of representation. Traditionally, representative rights for employees in Britain were limited to ‘recognised trade unions’, other forms of representation were not addressed. Following a decision by the European Court of Justice in 1994, in 1995 laws in Britain made provisions for non-union employee representatives for the “purpose of information and consultation…where there are no recognised unions”. (Terry, 1999) It is possible that Britain will follow Europe’s footsteps, granting further legal powers and recognition to non-union representatives. The increased power of non-union representative structures decreases the relevance of unions as they become no more significant (from a legal approach) than any other representative group. This situation can be approached in two ways.