ASSIGNMENT代写

澳洲堪培拉代写assignment:主观的道德

2018-10-20 18:19

从这个角度考虑,我们主观的道德真理改变的敏感性似乎不再像沙夫-兰道所主张的那样,与主观的道德模式相抵触。相反,沙弗-兰多的论点似乎建立在对主观主义的错误表述之上,他的论点建立在主观主义意图主观道德真理具有客观道德真理所具有的绝对正确性和严谨性的错误认识之上。由于主观主义理论所倡导的那种主观的道德真理并不被认为具有这种绝对的正确性,事实上,人们常常以它们在不同的人和不同的文化之间存在差异和变化的倾向而称赞它们,沙夫-兰道的观点认为,在我们质疑自己的道德观念的同时,用这些观念来确定我们的道德信念时,存在着一种冲突。如果他的观点认为,这种冲突是由于我们的道德价值观对我们自己的质疑的敏感性而产生的,那么他的观点是错误的。通过这一节的论述,Shafer-Landau试图传达主观主义与个人质疑其道德信仰的倾向相冲突(第296页)。我以两种方式反对这个结论,每一种都与我认为沙夫-兰道认为这种冲突存在的最可能的两个原因之一相对应。首先,我认为沙夫-兰道的结论是不正确的,如果它是基于这样一个错误的前提,即由于我们倾向于质疑事实的道德真理,这种冲突是存在的。第二,我发现这个结论是不正确的,如果它是基于这样一个前提,即主观的道德真理不可能因为我们对自己的道德价值观的质疑而容易适应或改变。
澳洲堪培拉代写assignment:主观的道德
When considered in this light, it no longer appears that the susceptibility of our subjective moral truths to change truly conflicts with the subjectivist model of morality, as Shafer-Landau may be arguing. Rather, it seems that Shafer-Landau’s argument rests on a misrepresentation of subjectivism, whereby he is arguing based on a false perception that subjectivism intends for subjective moral truths to possess the level of infallibility and rigidness held by objective moral truths. Because the kind of subjective moral truths championed by subjectivist theory are not expected to possess this level of infallibility, and are, in fact, often celebrated for their tendency to differ and change across people and cultures, Shafer-Landau’s argument for the presence of a conflict in our tendency to question our own moral perceptions while using them to determine our moral beliefs appears false if it intends to argue that this conflict is derived from the resulting susceptibility of our moral values to our own questioning.Through his argument in this section, Shafer-Landau seeks to convey that subjectivism conflicts with the tendency of individuals to question their moral beliefs (p. 296). I have objected to this conclusion in two ways, each of which correspond to one of what I perceive to be the two most likely reasons for which Shafer-Landau believes this conflict to exist. First, I have identified that Shafer-Landau’s conclusion is unsound if it is based on the false premise that this conflict exists because of our tendency to question factual moral truths. Second, I have found this conclusion to be unsound if it is based on the premise that subjective moral truths cannot be susceptible to adaptation or change due to our questioning our own moral values.