ASSIGNMENT代写

澳洲堪培拉assignment代写 特殊教育需求法案

2020-07-05 16:18

23年后,《特殊教育需求法案》(2001年)提出,送出的孩子应该在主流学校接受教育,除非这与其他学生的有效教育不相符合,或者,如果学生的父母拒绝接受主流学校教育的概念。与Warnock报告(1978)相比,这表现出了包容性的做法,家长和学生在哪里可以接受教育方面有更多的选择。《发送法案》(2001年)建议,负责学校招生的适当人员在决定录取时应采取合理的步骤,以确保残疾学生与其他非残疾学生相比不会处于明显的劣势。该法案还建议,应执行一项无障碍战略,提高残疾学生参与学校课程的程度。《发送法案》(2001年)还建议,学校将发送学生拒之门外以歧视他们是非法的。《儿童和家庭法》(2014年)通过暗示地方当局必须考虑所涉儿童及其父母的观点、感情和愿望,从而影响了包容性实践的进展。还有人指出,儿童及其父母应充分参与所需要作出的任何决定,并应向他们提供一切必要的支持和资料,使他们能够参与这些决定。
澳洲堪培拉assignment代写 特殊教育需求法案
 Twenty-three years later the Special Educational Needs Act (2001) argued that children with SEND should be educated in a mainstream school unless it was incompatible with the provision of efficient education of other pupils, or, if the pupil’s parents rejected the concept of mainstream schooling. In comparison to the Warnock Report (1978) this exhibited inclusive practice as parents and pupils were given more choice regarding where they could be educated. The SEND Act (2001) advised that the appropriate person responsible for the school admissions should take reasonable steps when determining admissions to ensure disabled students were not placed at a significant disadvantage compared to other pupils whom were not disabled. The act also suggested that there should be an accessibility strategy implemented, increasing the extent to which disabled pupils can participate in the school’s curriculum. The SEND Act (2001) also advised that it would be unlawful for a school to discriminate against students with SEND by excluding them from school.The Children and Families Act (2014) influenced progression in inclusive practice by implying that the local authorities must consider the views, feelings and wishes of the child involved and their parents. It was also stated that the child and the child’s parents were to be fully involved in any decisions required to be made and they must be provided with all the necessary support and information to enable them to participate in these decisions.
本段内容来自网络 并不是我们的写手作品 请勿直接剽窃,查重100%,造成后果与本站无关。如需定制论文请记得联系我们。